TheNEWS Nigeria's leading news magazine. Published since 1993     Currently, it's
Member login
Username
Password
Registration
Lost password?
 
 

Photo Gallery

Bayo-Onanuga,publisher-of-TThe-Author-Col.-Gabreil-AjaNosa-IgieborElder-Sunday-Oluborode-and-Chief-Duro-Onabule-also-att(R)-Mrs-Ebiye-Fari,-launchi

Opinion

When Am I A Nigerian? —Chichi Aniagolu-Okoye
Snowcalypse 2010 — Akunna Ejim
Letter To My Alma Mater — TOPE OLAIFA
Government Of The People… By Spirits — IFE BABALOLA
Save The Children From These Names! —Chichi Aniagolu-Okoye

RSS Export

Poll

Should NFF sack Amodu, after his performance at the just concluded Nations Cup?
View Results

Scheming To Sit Tight

February 23, 2009 10:18, 1,669 views
Peoples Democratic Party, PDP governors and President Umar Yar’Adua seek an urgent amendment to the party’s constitution which will give them tickets for the 2001 election, without subjecting themselves to party primaries

 By Babajide Kolade-Otitoju

At no time in the eleven-year history of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, have governors elected on its platform seen themselves as the most important components of the party than now. In the nation’s politics, characterised by unrestrained use of money as a means to an end, governors have increasingly seen themselves as a strategic and powerful bloc in the party.

tn-march-09-2009-cover

 The strength lies not in their number, but in the influence they wield and the amount of money they could throw around–when and if necessary. The mix of influence and money ensures that when it comes to taking fundamental decisions within the party, nobody treats them with levity.

Knowing how governors brought him to his knees just before the 2003 presidential primaries of the party, when most of them rooted for and urged Atiku Abubakar, then Vice President to contest against him, former President Olusegun Obasanjo was aware of the muscle governors can deploy. In 2006, he encouraged them to hold meetings with a view to producing Nigeria’s president in 2007. The governors got together under the leadership of Ayodele Fayose, former governor of Ekiti State, seeking to choose one of their own as Obasanjo’s successor.

  

Though the group did not choose a candidate by itself, as Obasanjo unilaterally picked Umar Yar’Adua out of the interested pack, which included Donald Duke, then governor of Cross River State; Ahmed Mohammed Makarfi (Kaduna), Victor Attah (Akwa Ibom), Peter Odili (Rivers), and Achike Udenwa (Imo) among others, the group rallied round one of their own–Yar’Adua. They did this by all means possible.

The governors were to show Obasanjo just how important they are in decision making in the PDP during the National Convention of the party last year, when they ensured the emergence of Vincent Ogbulafor as National Chairman, dumping Obasanjo’s candidate, Sam Egwu, former governor of Ebonyi State.

With Obasanjo out of power and incapable of coercing the governors, the former president, against his wish, yielded power and influence to the governors. The governors were clearly in control of majority of delegates to the convention and it showed.

The influence and power they had wielded for other people are now ready to be used for their own (selfish) interests. In response to the overwhelming demand of party members to have the PDP constitution amended, the governors recently set up a sub-committee to examine critical areas requiring amendment. These, they believe, will help “in addressing the clarion calls made by our “teeming party adherents all over the country for such amendments.”

The sub-committee submitted its recommendations last month. The far- reaching recommendations, curiously, have serious implications for internal democracy in the PDP. For example, the Governors Forum proposed an amendment to Article 12.8 of the constitution, which deals with election of delegates at ward congress. It proposes that only 10 ward delegates to the party congress are to be elected. There was no ceiling to the number of delegates previously.

The governors also propose an amendment to Article 12.17 of the party constitution, which deals with election of 25 delegates from each ward to local government congress. Instead of the 25 delegates from each ward of the local council elected at the ward congress, at least five of whom shall be women and who shall cease to function at the conclusion of congress for which they were elected, the governors want only 10 delegates elected at the ward congress. At least two (2) of these shall be women and shall cease to function at the conclusion of the congress for which they were elected.

The third amendment proposed by the governors is in relation to Article 12:40, which requires the accommodation of 25 delegates from each local council to the state congress. Now, the provision for the 25 delegates, according to the amendment proposed by the governors, will read three delegates, who shall now be elected to the state congress. This, most likely, will freeze women out.

Article 12:57, which deals with the inclusion of delegates in zonal congress was, however, not amended. It says zonal congresses shall consist of all members of the Zonal Working Committee, three zonal executive committees and the state executive commitees and all delegates to the national convention. On composition of National Convention of the party, i.e. Article 12:84, the governors propose to add former governors and their deputies.

This, an analyst told TheNEWS, seeks to give governors and their deputies a role in the party, even long after they are out of power. The sixth amendment proposed by the governors relates to Article 17 of the constitution, which deals with the procedure for nomination of candidates for elective offices. Here, the governors favour 10 delegates over the subsisting 25. They also want election of ward officers and councillorship candidates to be by direct primaries, at which all card-carrying members of the party at ward level shall participate.

The governors are of the view that the delegate system favoured by the PDP and other parties must be modified in the interest of party unity. They argue that the delegate system should be ditched because it “breeds violence and rancour, which will only spell doom for our dear party.” They are convinced that party officials at all levels are “the most appropriate category of persons to be entrusted with the important task of electing candidates suitable to contest public offices.” In addition, they posit that the delegate system encourages wealthy individuals to disrupt the election processes, even when credible candidates abound.

Perhaps the most controversial of all are the amendments proposed to Article 9:2, which deals with obligation of the party to its members. Here, there are three amendments which the governors described as very vital and cogent. The governors are proposing two new paragraphs to be added to the existing paragraphs. On page 18 of the document, the governors propose that “the party shall issue automatic tickets to any first-term serving president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and all first-term serving governors, who have expressed interest to re-contest for a second term without going through party primaries.”

The President can lose this privilege if there is a petition of misconduct supported by two-third
majority of governors and elected members of the National Assembly from the party. In the case of the governor of a state, such a petition has to be supported by “2/3 majority of PDP council chairmen and members of state Houses of Assembly. The petition must have been received not later than nine months to the expiration of the tenure of such a candidate and is verified to be true by the National Executive Committee of the party. The governors propose that where the party verifies and finds the allegations in the petition to be true, the candidate would be subjected to primaries.

In the amendment presented to the party leadership, the governors claim that “allowing such distinguished party members to proceed into party primaries is not only counter-productive, but capable of generating unnecessary tensions.” They also argued that not allowing the president and governors to go through party primaries will “create the enabling environment for stability, purposeful leadership and dedication to duty,” adding that “Experience has shown that there is a need to protect their interest.”

But many party members slammed the governors as arrogant and selfish, especially for considering themselves and the President as the only elected officers deserving of automatic tickets for a second term in office. Many are wondering whether only governors or the President can provide good leadership deserving of a second throw of the dice. Local government chairmen, state assembly members and National Assembly members are excluded from the governors’ proposed amendment to the PDP constitution.

Indeed, the position of the governors is not only unconstitutional, but also antithetical to one of the recommendations of the Justice Mohammed Uwais Electoral Reform Committee, which states that political parties should encourage internal democracy. The action of PDP governors also challenges the initial public posture of Yar’Adua, who had called on the political parties to support a free and fair emergence of candidates for political offices.

But those who are familiar with the the PDP are aware of the party’s penchant for treating serious political issues as a ‘family affair’. Only last year, Vincent Ogbulafor emerged the party’s chairman at a National Convention that was supposed to have produced a democratically elected chairman. But this was not to be, as the governors ditched all the candidates at the last minute for Ogbulafor, whose election still remains an issue of controversy.

Sources close to TheNEWS revealed that the governors are seeking greater autonomy in the appointment of candidates at both the national and state congresses. This will, therefore, pave the way for only the governors’ aides and loyalists to constitute the college of delegates. This will, naturally, exclude party members from participation in choosing the party’s representatives. It also impleis that even if a governor is unpopular, he could get a chance to recontest just by working on the members of the state assembly and party leaders, thereby shutting out ordinary party members from exercising their right to choose their representatives. By this, the acrimony the party hopes to avoid will be its lot on account of exclusion of ordinary members.

However, the party will become attractive to governors of other parties, who will see it as a surefire way of securing tickets to recontest rather than submit themselves to competition in their parties. Zamfara State governor, Mahmuda Shinkafi, who recently decamped to the PDP from the All Nigeria Peoples Party, ANPP, will win an automatic ticket if the proposal sails through.

Henry Seriake-Dickson, Chairman House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary described the proposed amendment as “ highly undemocratic.” “Whatever decision they take,” he said, “we would revise it by law.” He added that his committee has started working on a bill to check the excesses of some unscrupulous politicians who abhor internal democracy.

Dickson is supported Chiedu Godswill Eluemunor, a House of Representatives member from Anambra State. Eluemunor, a PDP member, said the desire of the governors to have automatic ticket is not democratic and cannot be operational. “If they say our democracy is young and we should amend the constitution to stabilise it, they may have a reason. But even in the face of that, it is still totally undemocratic because that will amount to closing the political space. Nobody has the monopoly of ideas to bring meaningful change to the system. Again, they have no right to deny anybody the constitutional right to aspire to any position. It will only land us in anarchy,” he argued.

Polycarp Nwite, former Ambassador to Botswana and now Senior Special Assistant to the President on Political Affairs, said:‘‘For us to have a free and fair election in this country, I strongly believe that the best thing we should do in the PDP is to first have democracy within the party, where from ward to the presidency, primaries have to be transparent.’’

He added that it makes no sense to give automatic ticket to governors and the President and said Yar’ Adua will not succumb to such blackmail. ‘‘Are they saying that if a governor did not perform and if he steals all our money, we can give him another chance for him to steal more? Is that what you are saying? Gentleman, do not forget that I fought for democracy, I am a hero of democracy and I am recognised as such. And I will not trade it for anything. I stand for democracy,’’ he declared.

Strong contrary opinions, no doubt. But in a country where executive positions provide access to near-limitless cash and other instruments of coercion, such opinions have very slender chances of standing up to the governors’ juggernaut.

Did you Enjoy this story? you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Random Post

No tags for this post.

Related posts

Comments (5)

  1. Dr Pat Kolawole Boboye

    23 February 2009 18:54

    PDP-Umaru Yar’dua and his rogues cohorts in PDP would be removed eventually as Yar’dua has finally shown that he is anti-democacy and represents backwardness and under-development to Nigeria and its citizens.A man with poor health who knowingly connived with Obasanjo and PDP to stole people’s mandate from the original winner-Gen Buhari would always live to regret his actions at the end along with his criminal cohorts in PDP.Yar’dua represents bad omen for the nation.Glory to God that finally Nigerians are retaking there nation back gradually as former PDP-Governor Olusegun Agagu and PDP-Oni of Ondo and Ekiti states have been removed and PDP-Oni would not make it back to governance in Ekiti state as envisage via Professor of election-rigging-Iwu/INEC at the re-run election within 90-days as ordered by the appeal court.PDP is now in disaray and shall finally break up in peices. Dr Pat Kolawole Boboye,Canada.

  2. Tokunbo Oluwole

    25 February 2009 19:39

    As a Nigerian, it is sad to watch how the country is being run by the obviously unprepared Yar’Adua government. The government and the man at the helm clearly lack the people’s mandate and goodwill. After being in office for two years, the Yar’Adua administration is not known to have recorded any significant success … something that Nigerians can be cheerful about. Unemployment and crimes are on the rise while corrupt practices, especially perpetrated by public officials, continue unabated. The fact that Maurice Iwu is still the Chief Electoral Officer of Nigeria is a testament to the present administration’s support of political corruption. In spite of the rampart corruption in the country, there is no record of any of the corrupt former governors/government officials being brought to book to serve as deterrents to others. A country, like Nigeria, that has a culture of celebrating stolen wealth while the majority of her citizens live in poverty will find it very difficult to achieve any meaningful progress either economically, socially, or democratically. A good starting point, with respect to the match toward recovery from the decadence and posterity, will be the promotion of attitudinal changes both on the part of the government and the governed. I believe that change must start from the top … to set good examples for the people and to build up a system that rewards good virtues, but punishes bad behaviors regardless of the person(s) involved!

    Dr. Tokunbo Oluwole, U.S.A.

  3. JOB ONUH

    27 February 2009 15:51

    THEY WANT TO LEGITIMIZE ILIGITIMACY WHICH IS WHAT PDP AS A PARTY STANDS FOR. THE FORMER PRESIDENT DID IT AND HE IS ENJOYING IT TODAY AS THE BOT CHAIRMAN. SO, I KNOW THAT THEY MAY ACHIEVE THEIR MISCHIEVOUS AIM WHICH IS THE HALLMARK OF PDP. ANY RIGHT THINKING INDIVIDUAL STILL IN THE PARTY SHOULD LEAVE NOW THAT THE OVATION IS LOUDEST.

  4. Kayode Raphael Adegboye

    1 March 2009 12:56

    This piece again reinforces the point that the Nigerian State is like a toy in the hand of a ‘family’ and members of this family throw it around and could even mess around with it as they like. Afterall it’s only a ‘toy’.

    It’s pathetic that our sense of governance and leadership has being tainted by negative politicking - instituting god-fatherism, changing the rules in the course of the game, seeking rents and getting drunk with power and position, and we now have political contractors and mercenaries instead of Statesmen as our voices.

    Well, the governors are only trying to add their own blocks to a foundation that was already laid.

    My worry with all these mumbo jumbo is whether we would get out of it soon and really face meaningful and more needful issues relating to improving the welfare of the populace - providing power, creating jobs, improving access to health and education, boosting the non-oil base of the economy and doing all that will position Nigeria where it really should be among the countries of the world.

    I am deeply concerned whether we would not keep branding misconducts and misappropriations within the cycle of power as ‘family affairs’ and the reactions or comments of the millions outside of this family would not count.

    I pray and hope for a better Nigeria. Long live ‘our hope’ Nigeria.

  5. samaila

    2 March 2009 07:00

    Na wawooo, PDP indeed, peoples distructive party!

Comment